View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lestrade Bug Fister
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 Posts: 1760 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:42 pm Post subject: Official New Games Reactions Thread |
|
|
Post here when you want to spout off about something you've read about somewhere randomly!
I'll start: Dragon Quest IX: does anyone else think the admission of classic turn-based battles is cheap pandering to an initial audience reaction? I wanted to play this, but I'm just so sick of turn-based battles that I've lost all interest beyond the pretty visuals. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
elvis.shrugged .
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 108 Location: Stratford, CT
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fucking JRPGs, man. Just when they say they're going to do something even semi-awesome, they go right back to that.
I mean, we could have had a cel-shaded, online-enabled Secret of Mana.
I kind want to check out FFXII, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pijaibros .
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 342 Location: Mistake by the Lake
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wasn't Twilight Princess also cheap pandering due to audience reaction to Wind Waker?
I'm more sour that FFXIII isn't going to build on what FFXII did. Then again this is Square-Enix we're talking about here. They do nothing, but disappoint nowadays. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dhex Breeder
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 6319 Location: brooklyn, Nev Yiork
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
turn based isn't the worst thing an rpg can do.
waste your fucking time, now that's the worst thing it can do. jrpgs eat time like a hungry caterpillar. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
elvis.shrugged .
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 108 Location: Stratford, CT
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pijaibros, how is FFXIII not going to build off of XII? I heard that it's going to have real-time combat and all the stuff that was introduced in XII. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lestrade Bug Fister
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 Posts: 1760 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well said, Dhex. Still, playing a multiplayer RPG and... selecting menus doesn't seem like a thrilling promise. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pijaibros .
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 342 Location: Mistake by the Lake
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
elvis.shrugged wrote: | I heard that it's going to have real-time combat and all the stuff that was introduced in XII. |
It is? I heard the total opposite!
I must've heard wrong then!
This does mean I may look at it when it's released! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
helicopterp .
Joined: 13 May 2006 Posts: 1435 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I read about Dewy's Adventure for the Wii. Dewy, a drop of water, supposedly has all his abilities from the start. I can't tell you how happy this makes me.
You roll Dewy around his cute-sy world as if it were Kororinpa. If Dewy raises the temperature, he turns to vapor. As vapor, Dewy can't be attacked, but he also doesn't move any more when you tilt the board, and is rather subject to whatever the air does to him. You can also lower the temperature, and Dewy turns into a block of ice. I am not sure what the advantage of this form is, but I assume there is one. When you are a block of ice, though, movement is very tricky. You slip and slide and whatnot, and edges become very real dangers.
I think what made me most excited about this was that I saw a clip of a boss fight against a frog. Dewy has to turn to vapor to avoid the frog's tongue attack, then quickly make it cold so that the frog's outstretched tongue gets stuck on some ice (brilliant!) before you take advantage and clobber him. _________________ Like you thought you'd seen copter perverts before. They were nothing compared to this one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dhex Breeder
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 6319 Location: brooklyn, Nev Yiork
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Still, playing a multiplayer RPG and... selecting menus doesn't seem like a thrilling promise. |
i don't think tgq has ever had the "what is an rpg" blowout thread, and we probably shouldn't start now.
what totally sucks, btw, is that while i was jazzed about any hassan i sabbah connection in a game, it looks like assassin's creed is going to take the fuckball puss way out and make all of your historical assassinations (or simulations or whatever the BIG TWIST is going to be) members of a european crusader party rather than sunni caliphate types, who were their general targets. (a few westerners were assassinated or attempted upon, but we're talking a tiny little bit)
boo! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SuperWes Updated the banners, but not his title
Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Posts: 3725
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:31 am Post subject: Re: Official New Games Reactions Thread |
|
|
Lestrade wrote: | I wanted to play this, but I'm just so sick of turn-based battles that I've lost all interest beyond the pretty visuals. |
I had the same reaction, but not necessarily for the same reasons. I'm not happy because their inspiration seems to come from fan reaction, but other than that I don't really have a problem with it. I'm not convinced that pressing a button is inherently superior to selecting from a menu. Action-RPGs are getting pretty boring to me lately too, and I'd almost rather have either menus or whatever it is Final Fantasy XII does instead. Removing the menus makes me much less likely to use anything other than physical attacks and healing spells, and I'd rather have a game that makes me think about what I'm going to do next than one that's just about pressing buttons.
And as much as I feel you on the multiplayer menu selection, I also kinda feel like the friend code system on the DS makes it so that the game might as well not be online at all. I'm playing Pokemon right now, and the only way you can really ever play with someone online is by logging in, selecting what you'd want to do online, and then sitting around staring at your screen until one of your friends happens to log in. Without having a constantly updating friends list it's pretty much worthless.
-Wes _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lestrade Bug Fister
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 Posts: 1760 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see what you're saying Wes, but... yeah. The dream is dead, man, the dream is dead. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
helicopterp .
Joined: 13 May 2006 Posts: 1435 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
dhex wrote: | what totally sucks, btw, is that while i was jazzed about any hassan i sabbah connection in a game, it looks like assassin's creed is going to take the fuckball puss way out and make all of your historical assassinations (or simulations or whatever the BIG TWIST is going to be) members of a european crusader party rather than sunni caliphate types, who were their general targets. (a few westerners were assassinated or attempted upon, but we're talking a tiny little bit)
boo! |
I kind of think you're upset about this just because you won't get to see the reactions to it. I kind of think that is awesome. _________________ Like you thought you'd seen copter perverts before. They were nothing compared to this one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dhex Breeder
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 6319 Location: brooklyn, Nev Yiork
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
no i'm one of those dicks who thinks historical accuracy is important and it fucking pisses me off when someone takes something which is so easily framed or even coherently fictionalized and swaps stuff out for no reason. i mean, does anyone care if you're assassinating orthodox sunni religious figures from ONE THOUSAND YEARS AGO?
the reaction, i mean, whatever. people are fucking idiots, five minutes of book learning would straighten things out because the whole landscape of the muslim world in the 11th and 12 centuries is fairly straightforward despite all the inter sectarian schismaticisms and all. people would be like "oh, huh, that's pretty fucking neat" and totally understand why sabbah was so fetishized as a figure of remote power and beauty by so many countercultural types (i hate that term but you know what i mean) and gain some appreciation for the real story, or at least what we know of it today.
i mean, if you wanted reaction, well, you'd make two games:
1) "Mamluk" - you play as a member of this caste (forcibly converted slave-soldiers who eventually became a power unto themselves) in northern india who decides to go AWOL and fight the delhi sultanate. probably rpg-based, maybe srpg. game ends with you being cruicified or immolated in some horrible fashion.
2) "Palestina" - you play a switched up rpg/fps game as a 12 year old kid growing up in the territories. checkpoints, poverty, idf raids, maybe even a relative arrested. try to walk the balancing act between what your family wants for you and what your local strongmen expect. culiminates in your suicide bombing of a cafe two game years after you start.
at least you know for sure no one would be happy with that! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
elvis.shrugged .
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 108 Location: Stratford, CT
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pijaibros wrote: | elvis.shrugged wrote: | I heard that it's going to have real-time combat and all the stuff that was introduced in XII. |
It is? I heard the total opposite!
I must've heard wrong then!
This does mean I may look at it when it's released! |
According to Wikipedia:
"From the footage shown at Eł, battles in the game appear to be in real-time, similar to Final Fantasy XI and Final Fantasy XII, but without the coloured target arcs linking player to target. Square Enix has also confirmed that the game will feature real-time battles."
^__^ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|