The Gamer's Quarter

[Lestrade]

Perfect Dark (N64): one of my top ten of anything. I don't have a 360, and I recently read that one or more of the single-player levels in TimeSplitters: Future Perfect is not-unsimilar to certain levels of the N64 classic.

So, if I nab a cheap, used copy of TS3, how much "close-enough" gameplay am I going to get? Keep in mind that I very much enjoyed TS2, as long as it lasted.

[ryan]

For whatever reason (well, I know the reason), I took Perfect Dark as Perfect Dark Zero and had the near uncontrollable urge to run over to your place and jump on top of your copy like it was a live grenade.

Everything I've read about TS3 has been really positive, though nothing in terms of comparison to PD.
_________________
Come to me, Mordel. We shall depart.

[helicopterp]

Lestrade, I was planning on finally picking up Future Perfect for the same reason. However the single player mode plays out, one thing's for sure: it's not going to stir up the same kind of multiplayer fervor that PD did among my friends. I played the shit out of that game.
_________________
Like you thought you'd seen copter perverts before. They were nothing compared to this one.

[SuperWes]

Future Perfect is good! I didn't play much multiplayer Perfect Dark, and I've really only made it about half-way through Future Perfect, but I enjoyed what I played. It's certainly better than Timesplitters 2, and Timesplitters 2 ain't too shabby itself.

-Wes
_________________

[Lestrade]

[Alc]

I've got Perfect Dark and Future Perfect, and I can't say I noticed much similarity in the levels, but then I don't know Perfect Dark all too well. The engine is very similar, but if you've played TS2 you'd know that anyway.

I got more out of TS2 than 3, incidentally - picked the latter up cheap, completed it on single player, played it a bit more, then left it.

[helicopterp]