The Gamer's Quarter Forum Index The Gamer's Quarter
A quarterly publication
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Fork You, Pitch!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Gamer's Quarter Forum Index -> Quarterly Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
helicopterp
.
.


Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 1435
Location: Philadelphia

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:47 pm    Post subject: Fork You, Pitch! Reply with quote

I didn't think this discussion had any place in the Games News thread, so I'm going to try to send it here.

Swimmy wrote:
Ok, Pitchfork rant time.

Read this review.

Maybe you'll think it's not representative of their content. But if you think it's a good review, congratulations, you're a pretentious hipster, because this is the most meaningless bullshit ever written.

First and foremost, what is up with every Pitchfork reviewer insisting that you know how much they hate music? And why is the logical consequence of this that anything with a fast tempo (except Britney Spears' "Toxic") is beneath their listening standards?

And it just gets worse from there. "I See a Darkness is not music" because, hey, it'spretty good, and music is pretty bad, amirite? Then. . . Christ:

Quote:
A friend of mine said this: "I was listening to it the other day and someone called. I had to turn my stereo off. I couldn't just have it on in the background. It felt wrong."

In other words your friend is someone who regularly treats music as background noise, but s/he thought Bonnie "Prince" Billy was actually good enough to pay attention to. Don't you think that makes your friend, I don't know, kind of ignorable when it comes to criticizing music? Does your friend also talk on the phone while watching movies or reading books? Oh wait, I forgot we're supposed to hate music, never mind.

Quote:
I See a Darkness is warmer than the title would have you think, and darker than the warmth of the stellar musical backdrop-- the songs feel both familiar and eerily strange. Virtually every note feels like a universe. It's the type of record that demands solitary reverence. No, this isn't music. It can't be. It's something else.

See, this is what we mean when we say "pretentious hipster." (I usually avoid the "artfag" part.) There is not a sentence is that paragraph that means anything. Virtually every note feels like a universe? How do you tell the notes that feel like universes apart from the ones that don't? They all kind of sound like notes to me! Notes that, when placed in time and played on various instruments make this thing called music, some of which (in this particular instance) is good and some of which is kind of boring. Seriously, how are you going to give an album 10 stars, put it in the top 10 of your "best albums of the 90s" list, and not actually say anything that couldn't be said about a million other albums?

No, this isn't music criticism. It can't be. It's something else.

(Also this.)



No, Swimmy, I don't find this representative of Pitchfork's content nowadays. Furthermore, you're right. It's complete rubbish, and it certainly act as a "vehicle" for its author--although I can't imagine why anyone would want to claim that particular ride.

A couple of examples of well-written current reviews are:

http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/46899-american-gangster
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/46159-cease-to-begin

I used to take issue with pitchfork's practical ignorance of hip hop, but they seem mostly to have overcome that shortfall these days.


Dracko wrote:
helicopterp wrote:

True confession: I'm teaching a music criticism unit with my 11th graders right now. Today we're looking for trends in Pitchfork reviews.


Another true confession: I like pitchfork. Despite all the snark and the general idea that they are somehow the purveyors of cool, it's a very thorough website, and if you actually read the text of the reviews, they stuff them with interesting information.


Why would you do this?


We're doing it because I wanted to show my students the type of content that is typically featured in a review (some background about the artist, some insight into the creation and production of the album, other artists or individuals involved in the production of the music, descriptions of the way the music sounds, what works and what doesn't, etc.) as well as some of the technical information that should be supplied (brief lyrics quotes, song titles, name of the record label, name of the artist and album. It's also an attempt to show them diverse ways to make a career with writing, which is not something many of my students consider. I teach students who are almost entirely--there are few enough exceptions that I can count then on one hand--poor and black, and careers in fields like music criticism are extremely remote concepts in their minds. It's exposure for the vast majority of my students, if not all of them.*


Harveyjames, I'm sorry about that obnoxious review of your friend's stuff. It was, like Swimmy's example, worthless as music criticism or, indeed, writing of any kind.






*that's the really, really, extreeeeeeeeeeeeemely short version of my sociopolitical motives for the decision. If you want to talk more about them....set up a different thread?
_________________
Like you thought you'd seen copter perverts before. They were nothing compared to this one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dhex
Breeder
Breeder


Joined: 13 Dec 2004
Posts: 6319
Location: brooklyn, Nev Yiork

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pitchfork is pitchfork.

i.e. they do an interview with david tibet and go like "wow you use a lot of christian imagery, why?"
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
helicopterp
.
.


Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 1435
Location: Philadelphia

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dhex, I rarely understand your references, and that is hindering our relationship.


I've been holding that in for a long time.
_________________
Like you thought you'd seen copter perverts before. They were nothing compared to this one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dhex
Breeder
Breeder


Joined: 13 Dec 2004
Posts: 6319
Location: brooklyn, Nev Yiork

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

david tibet from current 93.

long story short, he's a christian. an apocalyptic in the catholic sense christian. who is learning coptic.

the idiot hipster fuck - who was only covering the man's work because hey a bunch of favs are on the latest album - didn't take 30 seconds to look up his bio on wikipedia. where it very plainly states that no this is not a joke and yes he is religious.

http://dhex.wordpress.com/2006/10/01/current-93-black-ships-ate-the-sky-with-bonus-dhex-7-pitchfork-needs-homework/
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
simplicio
.
.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 1091

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

this was always my favorite "pitchfork gets served" moment, from an interview with doseone just after his group subtle got big:

Quote:
PFM: When you released the Season EPs [four records of the band's early work], they were a work in progress. But was it weird to read the fan response to that? Or did you pay any attention?

D: Well the Winter one [a 37 minute ambient improv work] was hysterical, dude. Because we have, I mean, God bless 'em all, unGod bless 'em all, I love our die-hard rap fans, from the raw rap and battle days. But those dudes, they're the ones who really don't know what I look like, they assume I'm like 7'3" and Puerto Rican, you know what I'm saying? Or a goblin, a Puerto Rican goblin or something. So they come up and they do this whole, [b-boy voice] "Yeah man, Subtle, this Spring shit's cool, it's like a bunch of choruses, that's dope. But the Winter dude, where's Dose and Jel?"

And then there's this guy Jim Kaiser at Amoeba, a good friend of ours who plays a bicycle wheel. And his favorite thing, hands down, is the Winter session.

PFM: The flipside of that is, you get a lot of support from the Wire magazine.

D: Yes.

PFM: And the Wire runs reviews like, "Hey, it's 80 minutes of static!", and their readers will put up with anything.

D: "Put up with anything"-- that's an interesting way of...

PFM: I don't mean...

D: No, I know what you mean. Okay-- so what we do, whatever charm there is-- whatever worth there is in it to a third person-- one of the things about our music, is that it's been called egregious, or pretentious. We get these words that are mean compliments. You know what I mean? It gets a star for this, but it's not a good thing to have a star for.

What sometimes gives me an empty feeling is that I read these fucking descriptions of my writing and [they say it's] obsequious, and vague, and I just don't know what these people read-- do they think I'm on tabs of acid...What I remove from my writing is linear context. It's not really important to me, because it doesn't give me chills to see, "you flip the latch and the lock opens and then you can open the top of the chest and inside the chest is this." That doesn't give me chills, to think in that vein. So I've always kind of avoided it.

We make selfish music. The pace is dictated by us. If I want a breakdown here, I put a fucking breakdown here. I am not concerned about the 80 BMP consistency law of popular music. I'm concerned with other things, and they're very valid.

People have perceptions of our press and our acceptance in the press, and I have a very clear one. It's all The Wire. And then some magazines have known Sole and I since we were sending out our first 12"'s, like the XLR8R's-- we're sort of in the sea, but we're not picked. So it's interesting, what is it about the consistency of the palettes at The Wire, and is it experimental music, or is it just...?

I guess they're just open to all forms of music. And we only lay cleanly right now today across their palette, as being what we are and what we're worth. That's very curious to me. This is a point beyond which I cannot come back with answers.

We were a cult rap fetish, so if you were really into the dopest mainstream rappers in '95, then you kept looking, and Company Flow happened, and you got into that movement and you kept refining and trying to find the best rappers. And if you went all the way with it, you found us. So it was like Eminem, Slug, Buck, me, Sole, you know, and we went from that, having this sort of cult clutch rap thing, to our only safe bet being Wire readers. When we go play Sonar, it's like our fucking audience.

[Say] you have this guy at a record store counter, an indie record store counter, and a nice person comes in and says, "I want a record," and this guy looks behind himself, there are some new releases. He looks at the Anticon and he goes, "I love this shit, but I don't know if this guy will like this shit." But there's all these great records that you can safely recommend, whether it's Radiohead Kid A or Notwist's Neon Golden. Or Savath and Savalas, the first record, is fucking perfect, right? Or the Boards [of Canada] record. That may be the people we are in bed with, but we can't be recommended like that. We can't be recommended in the same handful.

Oh! I went and searched pfork for Robert Wyatt, remembering their laughable interview with him recently vs. the absolutely transcendent one with David Toop in Wire, and came upon a whole treasure trove, wherein half his back catalog is rated between 2.4 and 7.1! Rock Bottom? That's somewhere in the 4s. Brilliant!
_________________
"Worlds turn the new machine to thee. To thee. Though, thine the new machine space."
-Kurt Schwitters, 1919
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dhex
Breeder
Breeder


Joined: 13 Dec 2004
Posts: 6319
Location: brooklyn, Nev Yiork

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ha! i'm allergic to thesaurus rap but that was great.

i like the wire, myself, even if i don't like about 80% of what they cover. (it might be closer to 70 but i have no real interest in avant jazz)
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
simplicio
.
.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 1091

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Wire's absolutely my music bible. It took some conscious effort to get into it, but now I devour those. I've been looking for a secondary source too- Signal to Noise is pretty good, and so's The Sound Projector, except that one has nearly everything written by one of two writers so parallel tastes are very much required.

I've never found anything online to match any of them, especially since Brainwashed turned their reviews over to user contributions.
_________________
"Worlds turn the new machine to thee. To thee. Though, thine the new machine space."
-Kurt Schwitters, 1919
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aderack
.
.


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 1105
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This thread is fun, nestled up against the Rake one.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Scratchmonkey
.
.


Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 1439

PostPosted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it makes anybody feel any better, 2K Sports just Announced an In-Game Soundtrack and Music Partnership with Pitchfork Media for Major League Baseball 2K8*.

* - I worked on this game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aderack
.
.


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 1105
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What does Pitchfork say about "Baby Elephant Walk"?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
helicopterp
.
.


Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 1435
Location: Philadelphia

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pitchfork wrote:
The clarinets blow with a little too much 'we've-been-there-post-post-post-pop' blasé, but still manage to graze the soul in their incessant syncopated honks.

_________________
Like you thought you'd seen copter perverts before. They were nothing compared to this one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bleak
.
.


Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 258

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hahah, wow. Pitchfork's gone so far down their own rabbit hole that they've become a parody of a parody of themselves.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
helicopterp
.
.


Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 1435
Location: Philadelphia

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That was actually a legitimate parody of pitchfork. It's not their quote; I wrote it.
_________________
Like you thought you'd seen copter perverts before. They were nothing compared to this one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bleak
.
.


Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 258

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ah, well, good work then.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Harveyjames
the meteor kid
the meteor kid


Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 3636

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 4:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah Joe there's no actual Pitchfork review of Baby Elephant walk, what are you, an apedog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
helicopterp
.
.


Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 1435
Location: Philadelphia

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I bet "Baby Apedog Walk" could be a pretty interesting song if anyone wanted to write it.
_________________
Like you thought you'd seen copter perverts before. They were nothing compared to this one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bleak
.
.


Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 258

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

look james, I didn't actually read that post in the context of being a review for baby elephant walk, I just thought it was a silly excerpt, of which there are probably hundreds. Sad Sad
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Harveyjames
the meteor kid
the meteor kid


Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 3636

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sorry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lestrade
Bug Fister
Bug Fister


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 1760
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Argh, I meet Pitchfork-quoters all the time. I feel sites like this kind of ruin music for me. I don't read 'em and they don't read me; everybody's happy and I don't have to wear a neck scarf, you know?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
daphaknee
just enemies now
just enemies now


Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 892
Location: YAY AREA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

if someone quotes pitchfork around me they're going to get punched in the face

if someone quotes their favorite stupid movie around me i might just yell at them

but like, i wish people would just say this album is out it sounds like this band and it has these influences, you might like it!

instead of getting

ugh daphny utopia

anyway dhex i really liked your SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNN article okay i just read your brass bed article and iuts like UGH you just have to read reviewers that you agree with and its just soo
dfklfjfhjk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
dhex
Breeder
Breeder


Joined: 13 Dec 2004
Posts: 6319
Location: brooklyn, Nev Yiork

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks.

boredoms are playing march 30 at pier 5 in the city, for those in the city who don't already know.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
helicopterp
.
.


Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 1435
Location: Philadelphia

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

anyone i should see between march 15th and 18th? i'll be around that town.
_________________
Like you thought you'd seen copter perverts before. They were nothing compared to this one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dhex
Breeder
Breeder


Joined: 13 Dec 2004
Posts: 6319
Location: brooklyn, Nev Yiork

PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

there's a pogues show on the 16th, iirc.

today is the day is playing on march 17th at the knitting factory.

no doubt there's a few hundred other events going on as well. villagevoice.com is a good rough guide.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
daphaknee
just enemies now
just enemies now


Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 892
Location: YAY AREA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IF YOU HAVENT SEEN TEH POGUES LIVE DO IT

shane will be dead any minute now
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Gamer's Quarter Forum Index -> Quarterly Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group